1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 221 N.J.
  5. 221 N.J. Super. 162 (1987)
 

HERMANN v. RUTGERS CAS. INS. CO.

221 N.J. Super. 162 (1987)

534 A.2d 51

SAROLTA HERMANN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 19, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacey R. Sack, argued the cause for appellant (Charles E. Reynolds, attorney, Stacey R. Sack on the brief).

Anthony M. Campisano, argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman and Stahl, attorneys, Anthony M. Campisano on the brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, LONG and SCALERA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCALERA, J.A.D.

This suit involves a claim for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to pay for medical expenses incurred as a result of personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident in Hungary.

The facts are not in dispute. On April 13, 1985 plaintiff Sarolta Hermann and her teenaged daughter, Erika, were passengers in a rented motor vehicle being operated by plaintiff's husband, the named insured Laszlo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases