1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. 249 (1987)
 

MATTER OF JOHNSON

105 N.J. 249 (1987)

520 A.2d 3

IN THE MATTER OF HUBERT T. JOHNSON, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Reargued June 5, 1986.

Decided January 30, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill, Deputy Ethics Counsel, Argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Richard R. Width argued the cause for respondent (Lindabury, McCormick and Estabrook, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

Acting on a presentment filed by the District V-A Ethics Committee (Essex DEC) and five presentments filed by the District XII Ethics Committee (Union DEC), the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) determined that respondent, Hubert T. Johnson, had committed numerous ethical infractions. Specifically, the DRB concluded that respondent failed to carry out contracts of employment, in violation of DR 7-101(A)(2); that his misconduct demonstrated a pattern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases