1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 661 F.Supp.
  5. 661 F.Supp. 1482 (1987)
 

SOUND VIDEO UNLIMITED, INC. v. VIDEO SHACK INC.

No. 86 C 8780.

661 F.Supp. 1482 (1987)

SOUND VIDEO UNLIMITED, INC., and Electratainment, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. VIDEO SHACK INC., Arthur H. Morowitz, Howard J. Farber, Arthur C. Zwemke and Howard P. Levine, Defendants, v. Noel GIMBEL and Lee Gimbel, Additional Defendants on Counterclaim.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

May 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard J. Nussbaum, Alan M. Posner, Sonnenschein Carlin Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs and counterdefendants.

James A. Janowitz, David A. Nicholas, Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, New York City, Victor E. Grimm, Dennis P.W. Johnson, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

The defendants-counterclaimants in this action move for an order under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel certain non-party witnesses to answer deposition questions. The deponents asserted the attorney-client privilege in refusing to answer the questions. Because this court is persuaded that at least some of the questions pertain to matters within the crime/fraud exception to the attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases