1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 679 F.Supp.
  5. 679 F.Supp. 1446 (1987)
 

MEAD CORP. v. STUART HALL CO., INC.

No. C-3-86-359.

679 F.Supp. 1446 (1987)

The MEAD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The STUART HALL COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

May 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armistead W. Gilliam, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, Edward W. Goldstein, Michael Macklin, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

B. Joseph Schaeff, Timothy W. Hagan, Dayton, Ohio, Harlan P. Huebner, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

RICE, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Stay or Transfer (Doc. # 4). For the reasons that follow, the Defendant's motion is overruled in its entirety.

On August 8, 1986, at 3:53 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), The Mead Corporation (Mead) filed the instant action against The Stuart Hall Company, Inc. (Stuart Hall) seeking a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 2202, that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases