1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 684 F.Supp.
  5. 684 F.Supp. 1403 (1987)
 

PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.

Civ. A. No. CA 3-85-1539-G.

684 F.Supp. 1403 (1987)

The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Defendant, v. RAYCHEM CORPORATION, Defendant-On-The Counterclaim.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

April 13, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen H. Gerstein, Marshall O'Tolle Gerstein Murray & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., Michael A. O'Neil, Gardere & Wynne, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

V. Bryan Medlock, Jr., Richards, Harris, Medlock & Andrews, Dallas, Tex., William O. Fifield, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

Robert B. Cousins, Jr., Bird & Reneker, Dallas, Tex., for Raychem Corp.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motion of Raychem Corporation ("Raychem") to dismiss defendant's counterclaims against it in this action. After reviewing the motion, response, memoranda, affidavits, and exhibits, the court has concluded that Raychem's motion should be granted, for the reasons stated below.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Plaintiff Procter & Gamble Company ("P & G") seeks injunctive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases