1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 664 F.Supp.
  5. 664 F.Supp. 1370 (1987)
 

APELIAN v. U.S. SHOE CORP.

No. CV 87-1158 JMI (Gx).

664 F.Supp. 1370 (1987)

Seta APELIAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SHOE CORPORATION, dba Casual Corner, and Does I through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

July 17, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Smith, San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Service, Pacoima, Cal., for plaintiff.

James L. Morris, Ernest W. Klatte, III, Rutan & Tucker, Costa Mesa, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION and ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT

IDEMAN, District Judge.

On May 6, 1987, the plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand her action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) on the grounds that the presence of Doe defendants, who are citizens of California, defeats removal jurisdiction. The defendants filed a timely opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Thereafter, the Court took...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases