1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 745 P.2d
  5. 745 P.2d 1210 (1987)
 

RISE v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A39343; SC S34089.

745 P.2d 1210 (1987)

304 Or. 385

Erik Christian RISE, Petitioner On Review. v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 24, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Matasar, Portland, argued the matter and filed the petition on behalf of the petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Hoffman, Matasar & Glaeser, Portland.

J. Scott McAlister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the matter on behalf of the respondent on review.

GILLETTE, Justice.

This case involves the effect, if any, that a plea agreement between a criminal defendant and a district attorney can have on the Board of Parole's subsequent decisions regarding the defendant's parole date. The Board in the present case determined that it was not "bound" by the terms of such a plea agreement, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Rise v. Board of Parole, 84 Or.App. 741, 735 P.2d 380 (1987). We hold that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases