1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 683 F.Supp.
  5. 683 F.Supp. 1186 (1987)
 

QUAKER OATS CO. v. UNI-PAK FILM SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 87 C 2278.

683 F.Supp. 1186 (1987)

The QUAKER OATS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNI-PAK FILM SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

November 19, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah A. Lathen, Quaker Oats, Chicago, Ill., John S. Kingdon, William E. Wallace, III, Thomas J. Horton, Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

D. Patterson Gloor, Kevin G. Burke, Annette J. Regos, Cassiday, Schade & Gloor, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

The defendant, Uni-Pak Film Systems, Inc. ("Uni-Pak"), has moved to disqualify the law firm of Howrey & Simon ("Howrey") from continuing to represent the plaintiff, The Quaker Oats Company ("Quaker"), in this action. Quaker contends that Uni-Pak's motion is unwarranted by law or fact, and requests that we sanction Uni-Pak pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. For the reasons stated below, both motions are denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases