1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 674 F.Supp.
  5. 674 F.Supp. 1165 (1987)
 

FRIEDMAN v. GANASSI

Civ. A. No. 83-1946.

674 F.Supp. 1165 (1987)

Milton FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. Floyd R. GANASSI, G. Gray Garland, Jr., Stanley B. Scheinman, James W. Cooper, Laidlaw, Adams & Peck Inc., and The Ohio Company, the latter two defendants being sued individually and representatively on behalf of a class of defendants similarly situated, and Arthur Young & Co. partnership.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

December 9, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Malakoff, Richard A. Finberg, Pittsburgh, Pa., Jules Brody, New York City, for plaintiff.

Stephen Jurman, Paul A. Manion, Pittsburgh, Pa., John Matson, New York City, Dale Hershey, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MENCER, District Judge.

Milton Friedman, the plaintiff, brought a class action under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k. Friedman was unsuccessful at trial, and Arthur Young & Company, Laidlaw Adams & Peck, and The Ohio Company submitted bills of cost. This court is presently considering whether to award costs to these defendants.

1. Legal Analysis

The threshold issue in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases