ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
Defendants have filed various motions taking exception to the magistrate's November 23, 1987, report and recommendation that their motions for suppression of evidence from a wiretap and from searches as well as identification testimony be denied.
A. Wiretap
Regarding the wiretap, defendants first argue that the warrant was facially deficient because it failed to state, as required by Minn.Stat. §...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.