1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 680 F.Supp.
  5. 680 F.Supp. 1081 (1987)
 

OLDING v. CASEY

No. C-3-85-941.

680 F.Supp. 1081 (1987)

Robert A. OLDING, Michael T. Grillot, Plaintiffs, v. R.L. CASEY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

June 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Konrad Kuczak, Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Kenneth R. Pohlman, Asst. Pros. Atty., and A. Mark Segreti, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, for defendants Casey, Dillon, Daniel and Montgomery County.

Neil F. Freund, Dayton, Ohio, for defendants Reynolds, Dalrymple, Rice and City of Dayton.

Stanley S. Phillips, Roger B. Turrell, Dayton, Ohio, for defendants Gentry and Clemmer.

RICE, District Judge.

Counsel for the City of Dayton, Robert Reynolds, Carl Dalrymple, Charles Gentry, Jack Rice, and Robert Clemmer has/have moved this Court under Rule 12(b)(6) for an Order dismissing the Plaintiffs' cause on the ground that said cause is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. (Doc. # 11). For the reasons that follow, said Defendants' Motion is sustained, and the Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice (with the one exception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases