1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 663 F.Supp.
  5. 663 F.Supp. 1097 (1987)
 

LANEY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH

Civ. A. No. 85-2059.

663 F.Supp. 1097 (1987)

David LANEY, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Police Officer Renk, Police Officer Doe, Port Authority Transit of Allegheny County, and Bus Driver Roe, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

July 9, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan Ira Medoff, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Irvin S. Bails, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Port Authority and Roe.

Bryan Campbell, Mansmann, Beggy & Campbell, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Renk.

Charles P. Falk, Baskin, Flaherty, Elliott & Mannino, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Port Authority and Doe.

Zan Ivan Hodzic, Asst. City Sol., City Law Dept., Pittsburgh, Pa., for City of Pittsburgh.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

COHILL, Chief Judge.

Presently before us are a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Port Authority of Allegheny County ("PATCO") and Bus Driver Roe, and a supplemental motion for summary judgment filed by the City of Pittsburgh ("City"). We granted a previous motion for summary judgment on behalf of the City as to state law claims against it at Count 2, because of immunity extended to the City under 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8541....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases