1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 673 F.Supp.
  5. 673 F.Supp. 1026 (1987)
 

THOMPSON v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.

No. C85 2423M.

673 F.Supp. 1026 (1987)

Paul C. THOMPSON, et ux, et al, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington.

Amended Judgment November 13, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard E. Bundy, Bellevue, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Bruce M. Pym, Douglas C. Berry, Graham & Dunn, Seattle, Wash., for defendant.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KAY, Visiting District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on their claim for an accounting of funds paid to Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) under a franchise agreement. ARCO moves for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claim for an accounting of the funds.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases