1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 659 F.Supp.
  5. 659 F.Supp. 990 (1987)
 

JOHN B. SANFILIPPO & SON v. CONSOL. RAIL CORP.

No. 86 C 5277.

659 F.Supp. 990 (1987)

JOHN B. SANFILIPPO & SON, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

May 18, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam Panger, Jr., Katz, Karacic & Helmin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Gary W. Fresen, Baker & McKenzie, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. ("Sanfilippo") has sued Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") under the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707. Sanfilippo alleges it is entitled under a bill of lading to damages caused by Conrail's failure to deliver Sanfilippo's goods with reasonable dispatch and in good condition. Now Conrail has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 56. For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases