1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 835 F.2d
  5. 835 F.2d 735 (1987)
 

ACORN v. CITY OF TULSA, OKL.

No. 84-2606.

835 F.2d 735 (1987)

ACORN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Bachmann, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Imogene Harris, Asst. City Atty. (Neal E. McNeill, City Atty., with her on the brief), Tulsa, Okl., for defendants-appellees.

Before McKAY, SETH and TACHA, Circuit Judges.

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

The City of Tulsa regulates the use of public property through a scheme of municipal ordinances. The Association for Community Reform Now (ACORN) challenges the validity of four of these ordinances before this court. These ordinances provide, inter alia:

Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances tit. 26, § 2 (1985).

It shall be an offense for any person to perform any of the following acts within any public park...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases