1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 686 F.Supp.
  5. 686 F.Supp. 789 (1987)
 

MICRO MOTION, INC. v. EXAC CORP.

No. C-84-20681-SW.

686 F.Supp. 789 (1987)

MICRO MOTION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. EXAC CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

November 3, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Brock, Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Inc., San Jose, Cal., John O. Tramontine, Jesse J. Jenner, David J. Lee, Fish & Neave, New York City, Mary Helen Sears, Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Claude A.S. Hamrick, Rosenblum, Parish & Bacigalupi, San Jose, Cal., Sheldon W. Witcoff, Seymour Rothstein, Daniel A. Boehnen, Allegretti, Newitt, Witcoff & McAndrews, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON PATENT ENFORCEABILITY

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

1. This is an action for patent infringement in which the issues were trifurcated for separate trials of enforceability to the Court, and thereafter infringement and damages to a jury.

2. The enforceability issues to be tried related to Exac's charges that Micro Motion's conduct in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases