1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 675 F.Supp.
  5. 675 F.Supp. 768 (1987)
 

BROAD v. CONWAY

No. 87-CV-1331.

675 F.Supp. 768 (1987)

Paul and Anna BROAD, Plaintiffs, v. William F. CONWAY, Robert H. Iseman, and DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

December 23, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul and Anna Broad, pro se.

Roche, Corrigan, McCoy & Bush, Robert P. Roche, Albany, N.Y., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

McCURN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Paul and Anna Broad, commenced this action against the law firm of DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey ("the DeGraff firm") and two partners in that firm, William Conway and Robert Iseman, basically alleging legal malpractice by those defendants. Presently before the court is defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 56. For the reasons discussed herein, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases