WEISMAN v. BOWER

Docket No. B022344.

193 Cal.App.3d 1231 (1987)

238 Cal. Rptr. 756

FREDERICK R. WEISMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SACHIKO T. BOWER et al., Defendants; SHEA & GOULD, Objector and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

July 28, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Shea & Gould, Jerold Fagelbaum and John G. Connolly for Objector and Appellant.

Crowley, Lebow & Cuneo, Arthur J. Crowley, Mark A. Brodka and Sarah J. Hoover for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

LUI, J.

SUMMARY

(1) (See fn. 1.) The law firm of Shea & Gould, counsel for Sachiko T. Bower and Preferred Capital International, Inc. (Bower), appeals from an order requiring it to pay $2,500 to Crowley, Lebow & Cuneo, counsel for Frederick K. Weisman, Frederick Weisman Company, and Rare Properties, Inc. (Weisman), as sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 for filing a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases