1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 658 F.Supp.
  5. 658 F.Supp. 763 (1987)
 

INDAG, S.A. v. IRRIDELCO CORP.

No. 86 CIV. 3139 (PKL).

658 F.Supp. 763 (1987)

INDAG, S.A. and Jamiltrade, S.A., Plaintiffs, v. IRRIDELCO CORPORATION and Irridelco International Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Corrected May 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Windels, Mark, Davies & Ives, New York City (Daniel V. Duff, Jr., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Dorsey & Whitney, New York City (Stephen B. Camhi, of counsel), for defendants.

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge:

This is an action to enforce a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Indag") by the courts of Switzerland. A judgment of the Cantonal Court of Vaud was entered on June 12, 1985, and was affirmed on appeal by the Federal Court of Switzerland on November 25, 1985, with costs on appeal assessed against defendants (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Irridelco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases