1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 737 P.2d
  5. 737 P.2d 652 (1987)
 

AFSCME LOCAL 88 v. MULTNOMAH CTY.

UP-89-85; CA A41264.

737 P.2d 652 (1987)

85 Or.App. 565

AFSCME LOCAL 88, Petitioner, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 3, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry H. Drummonds, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Barbara J. Diamond and Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Colombo, Portland.

Jane E. Stonecipher, Asst. Co. Counsel, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was John B. Leahy, Co. Counsel, Portland.

Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J. and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Local 88 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) seeks review of a decision of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) which held that Multnomah County (the county) did not violate an agreement with AFSCME that employes transferred from the county to the City of Portland (the city) would be placed in positions with the city comparable to those that they held with the county. We reverse and remand.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases