1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 674 F.Supp.
  5. 674 F.Supp. 671 (1987)
 

C. BLORE & D. RICHMAN INC. v. 20/20 ADVERTISING

Civ. No. 4-87-501.

674 F.Supp. 671 (1987)

CHUCK BLORE & DON RICHMAN, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. 20/20 ADVERTISING INC., a Minnesota corporation, and Duling Optical Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

December 8, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl D. Reiland, Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Brian E. O'Neill, Charles E. Steffey, Kristin A. Siegesmund, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Duling Optical Corporation.

Michael F. Gallagher, Hopkins, Minn., for defendant 20/20 Advertising Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants' motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

Plaintiff Chuck Blore & Don Richman, Inc. (Blore) is a California advertising agency which designs and produces commercials for television, radio and other mediums. Defendant 20/20 Advertising (20/20) is a Minnesota advertising company also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases