1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 669 F.Supp.
  5. 669 F.Supp. 652 (1987)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

669 F.Supp. 652 (1987)

R. Stockton RUSH, III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 18, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Lovell, P.C., New York City by Christopher Lovell, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City by Martin R. Gold, Robert P. Mulvey, of counsel, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ("Oppenheimer") and Scott Seskis ("Seskis") have moved for an order compelling the arbitration of plaintiff R. Stockton Rush's III ("Rush") federal securities claims and related claims and staying this action pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 3 and 4. The motion is denied.

Prior Proceedings

The opinion of June...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases