1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 669 F.Supp.
  5. 669 F.Supp. 602 (1987)
 

BOWER v. WEISMAN

No. 85 Civ. 8916 (RWS).

669 F.Supp. 602 (1987)

Sachiko T. BOWER, Plaintiff, v. Frederick R. WEISMAN, Frederick Weisman Co., and Rare Properties, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 10, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Montclare & Guay, New York City (Paul Montclare, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Summit Rovins & Feldesman, New York City (John L. Amabile and Kathryn J. Fritz, of counsel), for defendants.

Crowley Lebow & Cuneo, Los Angeles, Cal. (Arthur J. Crowley, of counsel), for defendants pro hac vice.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sachiko Bower ("Bower") has moved to compel answers to certain questions and the production of certain documents which have been withheld by defendant Frederick Weisman ("Weisman") on the grounds of attorney client privilege. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Information Withheld

The information withheld by Weisman falls into five distinct categories...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases