1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 674 F.Supp.
  5. 674 F.Supp. 591 (1987)
 

R. RENAISSANCE, INC. v. ROHM AND HAAS CO.

Civ. No. C-1-81-777.

674 F.Supp. 591 (1987)

R. RENAISSANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

January 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Guy Taft, William E. Santen, Leo J. Breslin, James M. Moore, Trial Attys., Santen, Santen & Hughes, P.A., Lindhorst & Dreidame, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Daniel J. Hoffheimer, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID S. PORTER, Senior District Judge.

I.

Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure sets forth the standard for summary judgment. Under Rule 56(c), summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases