MORTON THIOKOL, INC v. METAL BUILDING ALTERATION

Docket No. A033560.

193 Cal.App.3d 1025 (1987)

238 Cal. Rptr. 722

MORTON THIOKOL, INC., Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. METAL BUILDING ALTERATION COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 24, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kevin J. Dunne, Nicholas W. Heldt and Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Paul J. Herlihy, Gordon E. Hepler and Ramos, Herlihy, Broadbeck, Hepler & Cockle for Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

NEWSOM, J.

(1a) The question presented by this appeal is whether appellant Morton Thiokol is entitled to contractual indemnity from respondent Metal Building Alteration Company, despite the jury's finding that appellant was actively negligent.

The relevant facts may be summarized as follows.

In 1982, Metal Building Alteration Company (hereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases