1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 657 F.Supp.
  5. 657 F.Supp. 380 (1987)
 

KISCH v. AMMIRATI & PURIS INC.

No. 86 CIV. 0977 (PKL).

657 F.Supp. 380 (1987)

John Duke KISCH, Plaintiff, v. AMMIRATI & PURIS INC., Cadbury Schweppes Inc., Rose Holland House Inc. and Perry Ogden, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 3, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben C. Friedman, P.C., New York City (Ben C. Friedman, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Norwick & Schad, New York City (Tennyson Schad, of counsel), for defendant Ogden.

Satterlee & Stephens, New York City (Robert M. Callagy, William A. Simon, of counsel), for other defendants.

LEISURE, District Judge:

The complaint in this action seeks monetary damages, an injunction, and other relief for alleged copyright infringement in connection with a photograph used in an advertisement for Rose's Lime Juice. Plaintiff also asserts claims for violations of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act and for common law misappropriation and unfair competition. In his primary claim, plaintiff alleges that defendants' photograph infringed his copyright on a photograph which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases