STONE-PIGOTT v. G.D. SEARLE & CO.

Civ. Nos. Y-83-3215, Y-84-1254, Y-84-3768, Y-85-1353, Y-85-1714, Y-85-1763, Y-85-1887 and Y-85-4034.

660 F.Supp. 366 (1987)

Laura STONE-PIGOTT, et al., Phyllis J. Phillips, et al., Joan Labow, et al., Kathryn A. Bond, Patricia A. Pasternak, et al., Vicki L. Hughes, Bonnie Georgia, et al., Roberta Degennaro, et al., Plaintiffs, v. G.D. SEARLE & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

May 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Robert Erwin, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiffs.

James L. Shea and Paul F. Strain, Baltimore, Md., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in these products liability cases allege injuries resulting from the use of the Copper-7 intrauterine device (IUD) manufactured by defendant G.D. Searle & Co. Searle has moved for summary judgment, contending that the plaintiffs' claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.

APPLICABLE LAW

Consistent with this Court's analysis in Marder v. G.D. Searle & Co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases