TAYLOR v. TAYLOR

No. C6-87-978.

413 N.W.2d 587 (1987)

Kraig A. TAYLOR, et al., Respondents, v. Janice B. TAYLOR, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 13, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott C. Neff, Neff & Lager, Virginia, for respondents.

John A. Trenti, Robert H. Stephenson, Trenti Law Firm, Virginia, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., CRIPPEN and MULALLY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

On appeal from a summary judgment, Janice Taylor contends that the trial court erred in concluding that she was unjustly enriched by receiving life insurance proceeds in knowing violation of a decree which restricted the decedent's ability to designate beneficiaries and purported to give his children a vested interest in his life insurance plan. We affirm.

FACTS

Kraig and Kerry Taylor are two of the children of Glover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases