1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 208 N.J.
  5. 208 N.J. Super. 716 (1986)
 

HADDEN v. ELI LILLY AND CO.

208 N.J. Super. 716 (1986)

506 A.2d 844

SHARON P. HADDEN AND JEFFREY HADDEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 21, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edgar E. Moss II argued the cause for appellants (Moss, Powers & Lezenby, attorneys; Timothy P. Beck, on the brief).

John L. McGoldrick argued the cause for respondent (McCarter & English, attorneys; John L. McGoldrick, of counsel; John F. Brenner, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and GRUCCIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Sharon P. Hadden, whose husband sues per quod, brought this pharmaceutical products liability action against defendant Eli Lilly and Company claiming that she sustained in utero gynecological injury as a result of her mother's ingestion of diethylstilbestrol (DES) during the pregnancy. She appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint as untimely filed. We reverse.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases