1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 659 F.Supp.
  5. 659 F.Supp. 259 (1986)
 

CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO v. DORR-OLIVER, INC.

Civ. No. B 84-431 (TFGD).

659 F.Supp. 259 (1986)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DORR-OLIVER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment February 19, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Madelaine F. Grossman, Jonathan D. Elliott, Levett, Rockwood & Sanders, Westport, Conn., Gary J. Smith, Jose I. Sandoval, Beveridge & Diamond, Washington, D.C., pro hac vice, for plaintiffs.

William J. Wenzel, G. Kenneth Bernhard, George J. Markley, Richard A. Johnson, William B. Rush, Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves, Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant.

Thomas W. Witherington, Sheila M. Tierney, Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves, Bridgeport, Conn., for third-party defendant.

Ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment February 19, 1986.

DALY, Chief Judge.

After review and over objection, the ruling of the Magistrate is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and RATIFIED. Summary judgment will therefore enter on Counts One, Two, Three and Five. Partial summary judgment shall enter on Count Four in accordance with the Magistrate's ruling.

RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases