OPINION
DUNN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed his punishment at 10 years confinement and a $10,000 fine.
In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the jury's verdict of guilty was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. Appellant does not challenge the evidence showing that a robbery was committed, but rather bases his complaint upon the discrepancy...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.