OPINION ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We believe the state has demonstrated that the error in receiving testimony concerning appellant's constitutional right to remain silent was harmless under the test set out in State v. DiGuilio,
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN...
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.