1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 210 N.J.
  5. 210 N.J. Super. 601 (1986)
 

CONTENTO v. CONTENTO

210 N.J. Super. 601 (1986)

510 A.2d 295

IDA CONTENTO, PLAINTIFF, v. CATHERINE CONTENTO AND MARY FESTA, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY CONTENTO. CATHERINE CONTENTO, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY FESTA, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY CONTENTO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Cumberland County.

Decided April 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent J. Pancari, for plaintiff (Pancari, Zerella, Tedesco & Pancari, attorneys).

Joseph D. Marchand, for defendant (Marchand & Marchand, attorneys).

KLEINER, J.S.C.

This opinion amplifies with greater specificity a previous letter opinion issued at the conclusion of a nonjury trial.

The novel question presented in this suit for a declaratory judgment arises from a dispute over the distribution of proceeds derived from the settlement of a wrongful death action which involved, in part, claims asserted pursuant to the decision in Green v. Bittner, 85 N.J. 1 (1980).<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases