1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 635 F.Supp.
  5. 635 F.Supp. 169 (1986)
 

ABRAMS v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 83 C 8725.

635 F.Supp. 169 (1986)

Arnold ABRAMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Walter Duffy, John Doe, Richard Roe, also known as Agent 1S603, De Paul University, Martin Lowery, John Bucher, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

April 30, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen G. Seliger, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Raymond J. Kelly, R. Theodore Clar, Jr., Fay Hartog-Rapp, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather, Geraldson, Joan McAvvin-Gale, Chicago, Ill., for DePaul University.

James D. Montgomery, Daniel G. Welter, City of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., for City of Chicago, and Wm. Duffy.

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

A Rule 56(c) motion for summary judgment requires a two-part analysis. First, the movant for summary judgment must show the "pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The movant's demonstration of the absence of a genuine issue of material fact must withstand the non-movant's obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases