1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 206 N.J.
  5. 206 N.J. Super. 584 (1986)
 

STATE v. RHODA

206 N.J. Super. 584 (1986)

503 A.2d 364

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE R. RHODA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 6, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Gauer, Designated Counsel, attorney for appellant (Mr. Gauer of counsel and on the letter brief).

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Catherine A. Foddai, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, PETRELLA and COHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, J.A.D.

After a remand for redetermination of restitution following a prior appeal to this court, defendant again appeals, challenging the restitution aspect of the sentence on a different ground than previously raised. We conclude that there is no constitutional infringement either by an increase in the amount of restitution on the remand or by the failure to mention the possibility of restitution at the time of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases