1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 153 Mich.
  5. 153 Mich. App. 601 (1986)
 

DETROIT COUNCIL v. STECHER

Docket Nos. 81675, 81729.

153 Mich. App. 601 (1986)

396 N.W.2d 444

DETROIT CITY COUNCIL v. STECHER

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colista & Urso (by Philip Colista and Robert W. Palmer), for plaintiffs.

Donald Pailen, Corporation Counsel, and Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by James K. Robinson, Jay E. Brant and Lawrence A. Nathanson), for defendant.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and BEASLEY and R.M. PAJTAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases involve two disputes between the Detroit City Council (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) and the Detroit Budget Director. In Docket No. 81675, the circuit court denied plaintiff's request for a mandamus order which would require defendant to implement certain budget amendments enacted by the city council for the 1983-1984 fiscal year. The trial court held that the council was not empowered to enact budget amendments unless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases