LOMAX v. UNITED STATES

No. 83-1166.

510 A.2d 225 (1986)

Ronald H. LOMAX, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard K. Gilbert, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, was on brief for appellant.

Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Robert M. Morgan, Michael W. Farrell, Judith Hetherton, and Daniel S. Friedman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief for appellee.

Before NEBEKER, MACK and ROGERS, Associate Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance (dilaudid), D.C.Code § 33-541(d) (1985 Supp.), on the ground that the trial judge abused his discretion when, immediately before closing arguments were to begin, he announced that such arguments would be limited to fifteen minutes a side. We find no abuse of discretion; accordingly, we affirm.

I

Officer Sovonick, the government's primary witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases