1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 662 F.Supp.
  5. 662 F.Supp. 32 (1986)
 

PULLMAN-PEABODY CO. v. JOY MFG. CO.

Civ. A. No. 86-4802.

662 F.Supp. 32 (1986)

The PULLMAN-PEABODY CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOY MANUFACTURING CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 9, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Degnan, David W. Rivkin, and Paul Viecarrondo, Jr., Shanley & Fisher, Morristown, N.J., for plaintiffs.

John J. McGoldrick, Milton R. Ackman, and Alan J. Russo, McCarter & English, Newark, N.J., for defendants.

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Pullman-Peabody Company, et al, (Pullman) seek injunctive relief under Federal securities law and state law complaining of Defendant Joy Manufacturing Company's (Joy) amended retirement plan, sometimes referred to as pension parachute, along with allegedly misleading statements or omissions in Joy's form 8K filing of March 1986 and a press release in November 1986. Joy has moved before this Court for dismissal of this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases