1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 103 N.J.
  5. 103 N.J. 564 (1986)
 

MACK PARAMUS CO. v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL

103 N.J. 564 (1986)

511 A.2d 1179

MACK PARAMUS CO., MACK PARAMUS AFFILIATES, MACK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND MACK PARAMUS PARKWAY CO., PARTNERSHIPS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MACK DEVELOPMENT CORP. AND PARAMUS OFFICE PARK, INC., CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF PARAMUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EXCELSIOR PANBRO COMPANIES, INC., T/A MIDLAND PARK FOODTOWN, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Cuccio argued the cause for appellant (Cuccio & Cuccio, attorneys).

George B. Gelman argued the cause for respondents (Gelman & McNish, attorneys).

Robert L. Ritter argued the cause for intervenor-respondent (Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This appeal poses once again an issue involving the validity of regulations governing permissible activities on Sunday. This form of government regulation, commonly referred to as Sunday closing or Sunday blue laws, has been the subject of recurrent legislative and judicial treatment. The question in this case is whether and to what extent municipalities can enact local Sunday blue law ordinances that prohibit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases