1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 210 N.J.
  5. 210 N.J. Super. 427 (1986)
 

STATE v. CHUNG

210 N.J. Super. 427 (1986)

510 A.2d 72

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LASCELLES CHUNG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 21, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis C. Esposito argued the cause for appellant.

Leslie F. Schwartz, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges KING, O'BRIEN and SIMPSON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case presents a claim that defense counsel was ineffective because he did not properly advise his client on the consequences of a guilty plea. On July 12, 1985 defendant Chung moved before the trial judge to withdraw a guilty plea to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, on the basis that he had not been properly advised by trial counsel that a probable consequence of his August 30, 1982 guilty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases