1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 102 N.J.
  5. 102 N.J. 504 (1986)
 

MATTER OF JOHNSON

102 N.J. 504 (1986)

509 A.2d 171

IN THE MATTER OF KURT E. JOHNSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Executive Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Disciplinary Review Board.

Jonathan N. Harris argued the cause for respondent (Andora, Palmisano, Harris & Romano, attorneys; John P. Palmisano, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

Based upon a decision and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board), this Court issued an order to show cause why respondent Kurt E. Johnson should not be disciplined. The Board determined that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct in violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and (5). The unethical conduct consisted of a misrepresentation made by respondent to a trial court for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases