1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 102 N.J.
  5. 102 N.J. 485 (1986)
 

MONMOUTH CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH v. CHRYSLER CORP.

102 N.J. 485 (1986)

509 A.2d 161

MONMOUTH CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND RITTENHOUSE LINCOLN MERCURY, INC., INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for appellant (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Lillian Messina Nugent, on the brief).

Dennis R. LaFiura argued the cause for respondent (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; Dennis R. LaFiura and Ernest J. Cicconi, on the brief).

Martin J. McGreevy argued the cause for intervenor-respondent (Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

In this case Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler) sought to establish a new dealership in Asbury Park for its Plymouth and Chrysler automobiles. Appellant Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (Monmouth), an existing Chrysler dealer located in Eatontown approximately 4.25 miles from the proposed dealership, filed a protest with the Motor Vehicle Franchise Committee (Committee) pursuant to the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Franchise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases