1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 209 N.J.
  5. 209 N.J. Super. 362 (1986)
 

STATE v. GOETASKI

209 N.J. Super. 362 (1986)

507 A.2d 751

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN T. GOETASKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey V. Puff argued the cause for appellant.

Ellen E. Loughney, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph A. Fusco, Prosecutor, attorney; David Arrajj, Assistant Prosecutor, on the letter brief).

Before Judges KING, O'BRIEN and SIMPSON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

In this case we must decide whether a motor vehicle stop by a police officer on less than articulable suspicion of criminal conduct passes State and federal constitutional muster.2 We conclude that the officer had reason to believe the circumstances were enough beyond the ordinary, though not necessarily criminally suspicious, that the vehicle stop was constitutionally permissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases