1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 43 Wn.
  5. 43 Wn. App. 10 (1986)
 

WARD v. C.I.T. CORPORATION

No. 6565-1-III.

43 Wn. App. 10 (1986)

715 P.2d 141

JOSEPH G. WARD, ET AL, Respondents, v. C.I.T. CORPORATION, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane M. Hermanson, Philip S. Brooke, and Paine, Hamblen, Coffin & Brooke, for appellant.

Larry D. Gustafson and Gustafson & Reynolds, for respondents.

MUNSON, J.

C.I.T. Corporation appeals from a judgment holding the respondents, Joseph G. Ward and Donald P. and Patricia A. Manfred, were entitled to the proceeds realized from the sale of a front end loader for which both parties had a security interest. C.I.T. argues its interest took priority over the respondents' interest because the respondents failed to comply with the requirements of RCW 46.12.095 pertaining to perfection of a security interest in a vehicle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases