1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 213 N.J.
  5. 213 N.J. Super. 105 (1986)
 

GIERMAN v. M & H MACH. CO.

213 N.J. Super. 105 (1986)

516 A.2d 632

REGINA GIERMAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. M & H MACHINE CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 14, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacy L. Moore, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Stacy L. Moore, Jr., on the brief).

Thaddeus P. Mikulski, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Dietrich, Dietrich & Mikulski, attorneys; Thaddeus P. Mikulski, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and R.S. COHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by J.H. COLEMAN, J.A.D.

The novel question raised by this workers' compensation case is whether the 1979 legislative change in the standard for determining whether a heart attack is work connected applies to a case in which petitioner seeks to establish a causal relationship of a heart attack to a previously adjudicated compensable condition. The Judge of Compensation found that the statute

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases