1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 101 Pa.Commw.
  5. 101 Pa.Commw. 167 (1986)
 

TIRPAK v. BORO. OF SUMMIT HILL

No. 32 T.D. 1986.

101 Pa.Commw. 167 (1986)

515 A.2d 1018

Joseph Tirpak, Appellant v. Borough of Summit Hill, Appellee.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 2, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Sousa, for appellant.

Thomas S. McCready, for appellee.

Argued September 8, 1986, before judges CRAIG and DOYLE, and Senior Judge BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, October 2, 1986:

Where a borough zoning code expressly allows in a residential district "accessory uses ... customarily subordinate to the principal use ... but not the keeping of livestock or poultry," does the keeping of a pig as a pet, on a residential premises, constitute a violation?

Homeowner Joseph Tirpak has appealed from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases