1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 101 Pa.Commw.
  5. 101 Pa.Commw. 137 (1986)
 

HARTZELL v. W.C.A.B. (BMY)

No. 2980 C.D. 1985.

101 Pa.Commw. 137 (1986)

515 A.2d 1009

George Hartzell, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Bowen McLaughlin, York Div.), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 1, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald L. Reihart, Laucks & Monroe, for petitioner.

W. Jeffrey Sidebottom, Barley, Snyder, Cooper & Barber, for respondents.

Argued September 11, 1986, before Judges CRAIG, COLINS and PALLADINO, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, October 1, 1986:

Does an expert medical opinion that the claimant has fully recovered and may return to his pre-injury employment constitute substantial competent evidence to uphold the referee's termination of benefits where the physician, based upon a physical examination of the claimant, first opined that the disability continued, but changed his diagnosis after viewing a surveillance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases