1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 642 F.Supp.
  5. 642 F.Supp. 1456 (1986)
 

RUDOW v. CITY OF NEW YORK

No. 86 CIV 0961 (LBS).

642 F.Supp. 1456 (1986)

Norman RUDOW, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the City of New York Commission on Human Rights, and Lois Whitman, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stillman, Friedman & Shaw, P.C. New York City, for plaintiff; Julian W. Friedman, Scott M. Himes, of counsel.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, New York City, for defendants the City of New York and the City of New York Com'n on Human Rights; Julian Bazel, Dennis deLeon, Frederick P. Schaffer, Gabriel Taussig, Asst. Corp. Counsels, of counsel.

Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel, New York City, for defendant Lois Whitman; Marvin E. Frankel, Bonnie Blacklock, of counsel.

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Norman Rudow, brings this action against Lois Whitman, the City of New York and its Commission on Human Rights ("the Commission"), alleging three grounds for relief. Plaintiff's first and third claims are brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and allege that his "due process" rights under the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution were violated by defendant Whitman's conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases