1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 628 F.Supp.
  5. 628 F.Supp. 1457 (1986)
 

CCS COMMUNICATION CONTROL v. LAW ENFORCEMENT

Nos. 84 Civ. 1274 (RWS), 85 Civ. 6672 (RWS), 85 Civ. 7298 (RWS) and 85 Civ. 8492 (RWS).

628 F.Supp. 1457 (1986)

CCS COMMUNICATION CONTROL, INC., Plaintiff, v. LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. CCS COMMUNICATION CONTROL OF ILLINOIS, INC., Plaintiff, v. LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. COMMUNICATION CONTROL SYSTEMS, LTD. OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v. LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendants. CCS COMMUNICATION CONTROL SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff, v. LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 21, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Wm. Suckenick, New York City, for plaintiff.

Walter B. Udell, Philadelphia, Pa., Anthony J. Casella, Gerald E. Hespos, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff CCS Communication Control, Inc. ("CCS") and defendant Law Enforcement Associates, Inc. ("LEA") have crossmoved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact disputed by the parties, and that each is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Because there are no disputed facts which require a trial on the merits, and because CCS has failed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases