1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 647 F.Supp.
  5. 647 F.Supp. 1344 (1986)
 

PHILATELIC FOUNDATION v. KAPLAN

No. 85 Civ. 8571 (RWS).

647 F.Supp. 1344 (1986)

The PHILATELIC FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. Alan KAPLAN, Robert C. Wurdeman, Robert C. Wurdeman, Inc., Mildred Wurdeman, Barry J. Rieger, Barry J. Rieger, Ltd., John Peters, Peters & Vogt, Inc., Gregory Stolow and J. & H. Stolow, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended November 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Bonner, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff; Thomas J. Bonner, of counsel.

Bloch, Graff, Danzig, Jelline & Mandel, New York City, for defendant Alan Kaplan; Howard Graff, Neal S. Barlia, of counsel.

Beldock Levine & Hoffman, Robert C. Wurdeman and Robert C. Wurdeman, Inc., New York City, for defendants; Myron Beldock, Cynthia Rollings, of counsel.

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Alan Kaplan ("Kaplan"), joined by defendants Robert C. Wurdeman and Robert C. Wurdeman, Inc. (collectively "Wurdeman"), has moved under Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings, alleging the inadequacy of the complaint of plaintiff The Philatelic Foundation (the "Foundation") with respect to its allegations of "pattern of racketeering activities" as required by 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), (b), (c), the Racketeer Influenced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases